Thread:Darkknight2149/@comment-16533050-20180112031043/@comment-16533050-20180113185918

Your summary remarks come across as demanding and confrontational.

"For the last time, her name is NOT Larissa Diaz..." doesn't seem "calm and direct".

"Since people are STILL adding the blatantly inaccurate with no moderation or oversight." reads as condescending and suggestive.

"The second massive leap I have spotted in this article." seems passive-aggressive at best. At worst it come across as insulting.

Darkknight2149 wrote: "...and the invalid information is persistently re-added"

It was re-added once; that is not persistently.

Darkknight2149 wrote: "and the note was added because, to your own admission, administrators are too busy to watch it..."

Darkknight2149 wrote: "And I think it's fair to ask, if administrators are too busy to watch the page..."

I said the edit was easy to miss. Stop rearranging my replies to fit your arguments.

As for your edits, there is no need to add any demand, notation, remark, or quip to the infobox telling people what to add or not to add. No other wiki I have been on does this and there is no need for that practice to start here.

This is especially true after I have told you NOT to add it. Twice now. Therefore, my warning still stands and I ask that you let the matter lie.

- Geist